dita-users Yahoo! Group
Re: Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
I'm finding that the default HTML5 theme makes a pretty good preview for the slides since the presentation is within a window that is roughly slide like
Re: Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
Yves, That would be interesting. I hadn't considered using for the slide content. Cheers, E.
Re: Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
I do the following: - Topic title = slide title. - Abstract contains the information which needs to go on the "slides", because I see [abstract] as a brief
Re: Creating CHM with outputclass
Hi, The subject of the thread seems to be " Creating CHM ....". This means Windows HTML Help which is based on the HTML stylesheets and can be customized via
Re: Creating CHM with outputclass
Following up on Julio's comment, depending on what you are trying to do, ditaval flagging might or might not be a good solution. If you only want the ph to be
main index entries have all page numbers of their subentries...take
I've posted this question twice before, with no helpful responses. Here is an update and a related question. When using the OT (any version after 1.5.4) with
Re: Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
There is probably a set of metadata specializations or conventions for to capture slide-specific presentation details like the slide master and
Re: Removing a base DITA element through a constraint?
We are in the process of implementing a RelaxNG-to-DITA-DTD transform and it's pretty close. The project is here: http://code.google.com/p/dita-ng/ and people
Re: Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
It strikes me that for usability you need to constrain the content based on the slide template/format rather than select that as an afterthought with an
Re: Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
I've done something like this that allows me to produce PDF that resembles powerpoint, including a background image, title page, and uses table structure to
Re: Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
If we limit ourselves to content authored with the intent of slide presentation, then it's a little simpler, just because we usually know about how much
Re: Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
Nothing has immediately jumped out at me as missing or otherwise being inadequate. Your structure captures what I would want to capture. And lcInstruction
Re: Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
Hi Eliot, I had few comments with no idea if what I write is correct or not. I imagine that the elements would allow the reuse of content using conref as
Re: Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
... There is such a wide range of taste for Powerpoint slides. There are some common templates for layouts (title only, title and single text block, title and
Re: Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
OK, I've defined a specialization of the learningContent topic type that looks like this:
xslt not called from new plugin
Hi I have started a plugin to add to my DITA installation. - Using: - oXygen 13.2 - DITA-OT 1.5.4 The plugin goes into pre-processing, using extension point
Re: Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
Should be "learningContent", not "learningObject" topicref for slides. The learningContent topic type is the obvious base for any slide-like thing. Cheers, E.
Re: Removing a base DITA element through a constraint?
The feature proposal would need to come to the TC from a TC member and would need somebody to champion the proposal through the process. We are coming close to
Re: Removing a base DITA element through a constraint?
... Totally agree. Do I need to do anything to formally request that? The RNG->DTD transform sounds interesting. I'm planning to check that out sometime.
Topic type(s) for Slides: Thoughts or Requirements?
I'm getting requirements from several quarters for DITA-based training content that is primarily intended for presentation as slides. I am also working on