Diff for attribution/source/byline

Mon, 2009-03-09 10:54 by ngn_at_ebbrMon, 2009-03-09 10:57 by ngn_at_ebbr
Changes to Body
Line 6Line 6
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
[dt]name of term goes here[/dt]
+
   [dt]name of term goes here[/dt]
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
[dd]definition of term goes here
+
   [dd]definition of term goes her
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
[source]attribution goes here[/source]
+
      [source]attribution goes here[/source]
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
[/dd]
+
   [/dd]
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
[/dlentry
+
[/dlentry]
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Line 24Line 24
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
 Any suggestions?
+
Any suggestions?
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
 
Revision of Mon, 2009-03-09 10:57:

attribution/source/byline

Some of the definitions in a definition-list have clearly-defined attributions, for example ISO. It seems logical, if the goal is to produced a set of structured and searchable files, to use something like

[dlentry]

   [dt]name of term goes here[/dt]

   [dd]definition of term goes her

      [source]attribution goes here[/source]

   [/dd]

[/dlentry]

[source] is clearly not the element to use here, though; nor is [author].

Any suggestions?

XML.org Focus Areas: BPEL | DITA | ebXML | IDtrust | OpenDocument | SAML | UBL | UDDI
OASIS sites: OASIS | Cover Pages | XML.org | AMQP | CGM Open | eGov | Emergency | IDtrust | LegalXML | Open CSA | OSLC | WS-I