Diff for attribution/source/byline

Mon, 2009-03-09 10:57 by ngn_at_ebbrMon, 2009-03-09 10:59 by ngn_at_ebbr
Changes to Body
Line 6Line 6
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
   [dt]name of term goes here[/dt]
+
[dt]name of term goes here[/dt]
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
   [dd]definition of term goes her
+
[dd]definition of term goes here
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
      [source]attribution goes here[/source]
+
[source]attribution goes here[/source]
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
   [/dd]
+
[/dd]
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Current revision:

attribution/source/byline

Some of the definitions in a definition-list have clearly-defined attributions, for example ISO. It seems logical, if the goal is to produced a set of structured and searchable files, to use something like

[dlentry]

[dt]name of term goes here[/dt]

[dd]definition of term goes here

[source]attribution goes here[/source]

[/dd]

[/dlentry]

[source] is clearly not the element to use here, though; nor is [author].

Any suggestions?

XML.org Focus Areas: BPEL | DITA | ebXML | IDtrust | OpenDocument | SAML | UBL | UDDI
OASIS sites: OASIS | Cover Pages | XML.org | AMQP | CGM Open | eGov | Emergency | IDtrust | LegalXML | Open CSA | OSLC | WS-I